<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description>The Infinite Kind
Email</description><title>sean reilly</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @seanreilly)</generator><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/</link><item><title>Living Energy Farm: Zero Fossil Fuel Demonstration Project</title><description>&lt;a href="http://livingenergyfarm.org/"&gt;Living Energy Farm: Zero Fossil Fuel Demonstration Project&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Jon, part of the Moneydance support team, is involved with an effort to create and sustain an eco-friendly working farm without using any fossil fuels.  They are accepting donations and volunteers to get the project up and running, so please check it out if you’ve got time, money or equipment to donate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/1351285542</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/1351285542</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:33:50 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Warren Buffett</title><description>I love this guy&amp;#8217;s writing. From Berkshire Hathaway&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2009ltr.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;annual report&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People thought it was good news a few years back when housing starts – the supply side of the picture – were running about two million annually. But household formations – the demand side – only amounted to about 1.2 million. After a few years of such imbalances, the country unsurprisingly ended up with far too many houses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There were three ways to cure this overhang: (1) blow up a lot of houses, a tactic similar to the destruction of autos that occurred with the “cash-for-clunkers” program; (2) speed up household formations by, say, encouraging teenagers to cohabitate, a program not likely to suffer from a lack of volunteers or; (3) reduce new housing starts to a number far below the rate of household formations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our country has wisely selected the third option, which means that within a year or so residential housing problems should largely be behind us&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/426673538</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/426673538</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:41:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Digital Object Repository</title><description>&lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/january2010-reilly"&gt;Digital Object Repository&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;My first publish paper in many years.  It’s about a big project I’ve been working on at &lt;a href="http://www.cnri.reston.va.us" target="_blank"&gt;CNRI&lt;/a&gt; for the last few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/347723518</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/347723518</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:10:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Part of what I've been working on for a couple years now</title><description>&lt;a href="http://dorepository.org"&gt;Part of what I've been working on for a couple years now&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;A brand new protocol, client, server and utilities that provide an architecture for representing information as “digital objects” instead of URLs and simple files or byte streams.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/317428607</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/317428607</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:56:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Any conservatives want to argue that the US has the best health...</title><description>&lt;img src="http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kvdv8cv8IU1qa2kkzo1_500.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any conservatives want to argue that the US has the best health care system in the world after seeing this graphic?  I didn’t think so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/305011373</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/305011373</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:17:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Huge Privacy Leak: Santa's Database Compromised</title><description>&lt;a href="http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com/2009/12/another-leak-worst-so-far.html"&gt;Huge Privacy Leak: Santa's Database Compromised&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/293770581</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/293770581</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:08:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Photo</title><description>&lt;img src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kuv75cqu7P1qa2kkzo1_500.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/289271829</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/289271829</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:20:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>the left: objects to their tax dollars being used to kill people

the right: objects to their tax...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;the left: objects to their tax dollars being used to kill people&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the right: objects to their tax dollars being used to save people&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8140/leftvsconservatards.png" target="_blank"&gt;it is not complicated&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804705</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804705</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:33:46 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>If you haven&amp;#8217;t already seen it, check out the Washington Post&amp;#8217;s graph showing how McCain...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;If you haven&amp;#8217;t already seen it, check out the Washington Post&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html" target="_blank"&gt;graph&lt;/a&gt; showing how McCain and Obama&amp;#8217;s tax plans compare, broken down into income groups.

&lt;img src="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2008/06/12/GR2008061200193.gif"/&gt;

If you make under $111,645 per year then you will get a bigger tax cut from Obama.  If you make less than $226,981 per year then you get a tax cut from Obama, but a slightly larger one from McCain.  If you make more than $603,403 per year&amp;#8230; I don&amp;#8217;t imagine you&amp;#8217;re worried too much about money.

The WP sums it up nicely: 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Obama&amp;#8217;s plan gives the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If everybody voted for their own financial self-interest then Obama would win by a landslide in November.  Personally I think there are many other great reasons to vote for him.


&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; even better, here&amp;#8217;s a version of the same graph that &lt;a href="http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/taxplans/" target="_blank"&gt;chartjunk&lt;/a&gt; adjusted to be to scale based on the number of people in each income bracket:

&lt;img src="http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/wp-content/images/taxplans.gif"/&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804677</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804677</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:59:43 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>I&amp;#8217;ve just gotten back to my Paris hotel room after having dinner at Le Grand Véfour.  The...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve just gotten back to my Paris hotel room after having dinner at &lt;a href="http://www.relaischateaux.com/vefour" target="_blank"&gt;Le Grand Véfour&lt;/a&gt;.  The dinner was very French - small, luxurious portions served with incredible attention to detail.  I appreciate the chef going out of his way to accommodate my vegetarian diet - something that seems like it must be less common in France.  As fantastic as the meal was, the most amazing aspect of the dinner were my dining partners - &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Kahn" target="_blank"&gt;Dr. Robert Kahn&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pouzin" target="_blank"&gt;Louis Pouzin&lt;/a&gt; as well as Dr. Kahn&amp;#8217;s wife, Patrice.I&amp;#8217;ve had a few dinners with Bob and Patrice lately as I&amp;#8217;ve been traveling with them for the last week or so.  We&amp;#8217;ve been talking about the &lt;a href="http://handle.net/" target="_blank"&gt;Handle System&lt;/a&gt; and the Digital Object Architecture with various European groups such as &lt;a href="http://itu.int/" target="_blank"&gt;ITU&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.unesco.org/" target="_blank"&gt;UNESCO&lt;/a&gt;, but it was really amazing to hear these guys who changed the world casually talking about the &amp;#8220;old times&amp;#8221; and their work to bring packet-switched networks (ie the Internet) into a world dominated by entrenched telephone companies who entrenched in a world of circuit-switched networks.  It is also amazing how normal and humble these two guys are.I&amp;#8217;m trying hard to keep this experience fresh in my mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804624</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804624</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:05:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It&amp;#8217;s nice to see one of the best places to eat on Broughton St. got a great review.  I love...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s nice to see one of the best places to eat on Broughton St. got a &lt;a href="http://www.theedinburghblog.co.uk/eating-out/the-blue-moon-cafe-for-an-impressive-lunch/02-03-2008/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;great review&lt;/a&gt;.  I love this place, and they are really nice to &lt;a href="http://seanreilly.com/India/" target="_blank"&gt;India&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804608</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804608</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:56:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I just noticed that an old favorite radio show (at least when we lived near a station that carried...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed that an old favorite radio show (at least when we lived near a station that carried it), The &lt;a href="http://www.jeffersonhour.org/" target="_blank"&gt;Thomas Jefferson Hour&lt;/a&gt; is now available for free as a &lt;a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=206783908" target="_blank"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.  I can&amp;#8217;t recommend it enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804601</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804601</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:40:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Britain Drops &amp;#8216;War on Terror&amp;#8217; Label.  I like the reasoning behind the decision.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,159067,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;Britain Drops &amp;#8216;War on Terror&amp;#8217; Label&lt;/a&gt;.  I like the reasoning behind the decision.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804589</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804589</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:18:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don&amp;#8217;t think GTD is going to help with this one</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://seanreilly.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/screenshot.png" height="23" width="279" border="0" alt="screenshot.png"/&gt;I don&amp;#8217;t think GTD is going to help with this one&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804577</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804577</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:45:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The judge in this article is truly a horrible person.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The judge in &lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,877155,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; is truly a horrible person.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804563</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804563</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:41:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I&amp;#8217;ve just subscribed to a video podcast of TED Talks and have started downloading 37 of the...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve just subscribed to a video podcast of &lt;a href="http://www.ted.com/talks" target="_blank"&gt;TED Talks&lt;/a&gt; and have started downloading 37 of the videos.  Looks like I won&amp;#8217;t be bored anytime soon (as if there were any risk of that).  It would be nice if I had time to read a book in increments of more than 15 minutes at a time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804557</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804557</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:51:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Many people are predicting that Apple will announce a tablet-style computer this January.  Most of...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Many people are predicting that Apple will announce a tablet-style computer this January.  Most of those same people have been predicting a mac tablet for years, but this time I&amp;#8217;ll join them.Most tablet PCs have been too bulky, trying to do too much in hardware.  With the flip-around screens and built-in keyboards they tried to do everything a laptop could do because the windows OS required a real keyboard and mouse.  If you&amp;#8217;ve used an iPhone you know that you can do just about everything with a couple of fingers.  If you need more of an interface there&amp;#8217;s no reason a keyboard and mouse couldn&amp;#8217;t be connected via bluetooth or a simple dock.Here&amp;#8217;s what makes me think that Apple is going to announce their tablet soon:&lt;strong&gt;CoverFlow&lt;/strong&gt;:  Apple&amp;#8217;s method of graphically &amp;#8220;flipping&amp;#8221; through a collection of albums covers (or folders and icons in the just released Leopard) would be the perfect interface for a touch-based computer.  The iPhone and iPod Touch both sport it and with coverflow built into the Mac OS X Finder a general purpose computer can be navigated with a finger (or two).&lt;strong&gt;iPhone and iPod Touch&lt;/strong&gt;:  These are already basically mini-tablets.  Just increase the screen size, CPU and RAM and you&amp;#8217;ve got a great email/web/music/movies/drawing/video-chat/skype device that would be right at home in the kitchen, living room, or briefcase.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804548</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804548</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:26:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is something I&amp;#8217;m sure I&amp;#8217;ll never do.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://trifle.vox.com/library/video/6a00c2251d8df0604a00e398c1e0690004.html" target="_blank"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is something I&amp;#8217;m sure I&amp;#8217;ll never do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804518</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804518</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:44:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Related to my previous post defending Apple and their handling of Java on Mac OS X, Apple has just...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Related to my &lt;a href="http://seanreilly.com/blog/archives/40" target="_blank"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; defending Apple and their handling of Java on Mac OS X, Apple has just released &lt;a href="http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2007/tn2196.html" target="_blank"&gt;tech note 2196&lt;/a&gt; which includes all sorts of goodies for Java developers on the Mac.  This document includes settings that let java programs look and feel more like native Mac applications.  Because these settings are implemented as client properties, applications that use them can remain completely cross platform while gaining certain behaviors or visual effects on Mac OS that had previously been impossible for java applications.Here&amp;#8217;s a screenshot that shows a java app (&lt;a href="http://moneydance.com/" target="_blank"&gt;moneydance&lt;/a&gt;) with the unified toolbar, file proxy in the window title.  The window below can also be dragged by clicking on the gray background, just like a native app.&lt;p style="text-align: center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://seanreilly.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/picture-9.png" height="82" width="512" border="0" alt="Picture 9.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Between the new Java UI properties and XCode 3 I couldn&amp;#8217;t be happier about using the Mac as a development platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804510</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804510</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:23:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There was recently an article on javalobby.org complaining about Apple&amp;#8217;s support of Java on...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;There was recently an &lt;a href="http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t102936.html" target="_blank"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; on javalobby.org complaining about Apple&amp;#8217;s support of Java on the mac.  This article was uninformed, angry and just plain wrong on most counts.  The article and most of the responses really make java programmers look like a bunch of jerks.  So much so that it made me seriously consider (again) switching from Java to a purely Objective-C environment whenever I have a choice.I had started writing a long and detailed post about my thoughts on the matter but came across &lt;a href="http://www.symphonious.net/2007/10/31/java-5-on-leopard/" target="_blank"&gt;Adrian Sutton&amp;#8217;s&lt;/a&gt; and realized that he expressed the exact same sentiment, only more succinctly.  My favorite part:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;stop whining and start coding&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804485</link><guid>http://blog.seanreilly.com/post/183804485</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:15:11 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>

